A Hypothetical Blackjack Cheat (Dealer Collusion).?
The player 16 against a dealer 10 is a difficult call. If you know no other information you should HIT. If satisfactory small cards are on the table you should STAND. Hypothetically if you had the option of PUSHING these hand the player would actually have a statistical player margin (you will have to trust me on the mathematics).
- THE HYPOTHETICAL CHEAT (involves dealer collusion): When the contractor peeks for blackjack he signals with a code if he is PAT or STIFF. When player has a 16 vs 10 he hits when the pusher is PAT, and stands when the player is STIFF. It is important that the player does not use the collusion signal on any other hand or it will eventually attract the attention of casino shelter.
- This "small" cheat will give the player the same loving of statistical advantage that can be achieved by card counting and would be impossible to detect by protection. Also, unlike card counting, you can continue to flat bet.
- Most dealer collusion cheats are caught because the player make unbelievably accurate "guesses". Or if a dealer is paid to accord a "card slug" he is caught because the player suddenly place huge winning bets. A camera review shows the same cards as the previous paw. The advantage of this cheat is that it only provides a subtle increase surrounded by probability (you have to trust me on mathematics).
- What do you think? Would you do it?
Answers:
You are going to go broke so fast the dealer are going to have to deal contained by slow motion or they will miss you. There is no 'difficult call' about a 16 against a dealer 7 or above. 16 is a losing foot full stop. You might as well hit it. It is for that reason you split your 8's. Most casinos don't do that 'Peek' bullshit stuff anymore anyway.
Blackjack is a STAKING activity. You just play your standard game and press your bets when you are playing next to the house money or feel lucky.
You are of course assuming that in attendance are still casinos where the dealer in fact peaks at the card. Most, if not adjectives, have gone to electronic readers eliminate the dealer. Your last comment around most casinos in America still using the peek is misinformed. Tell me where on earth they still peek and I will book a flight.
If you want to win at BJ you should be sitting at a table that allows a surrendure of 15/16 against that dealer 10. Yes, hypothetical statistics would indicate if at hand are 5 players at a table with 2-6 decks contained by play, and you are at 3rd base with 16 against a pusher 10, and the first 4 players drew 2+ cards to make their hands that you are hitting a 10. So what! Without collusion, you can come to a similar conclusion more or less the dealer's card. The reality is, depending on the shuffle and number of decks you could hold 40 low cards all play in a round followed by 12 glorious cards played in the following.
Unless you have a huge bankroll, and can play beneath the raydar with incredible counting skills that can outplay the current decks and rules person implored by most casinos, your best bet is to lay basic strategy at the best rules to the likelihood tables and stop trying to out-think the game .. . it will see your butt.
If it took any more than 10 minutes to spot you following a peddler around his/her allotted tables I would want to know why. If my security department didn't know you know the dealer, I would also want to know why. If your dealer could verbs off a signal that allowed you to pick up on 16 against a 10 consistently there would be a big reshuffle within my CCTV department.
Been abandoned in europe? I have a sneaking suspicion that you will find that it was never used out side the US.
I would not have anything to do beside this. The reward is simply not worth the risk. Card counting depends on being able to rise and fall the size of your bet. This isn't possible in your system, all you're doing is prizewinning a hand (sometimes) you would have otherwise lost. And single in a very specific situation. Let's say aloud all your numbers and methods are accurate. How often would this situation come up, and how commonly would the information actually change the outcome? Once, I don`t know twice an hour? That's below the signal to noise ratio of the expected variance. In order to capitalize on that slight creep you would need to play a LOT of hands. And adjectives it takes is one pit boss to notice that you've "gotten lucky" near 16 a few times to call for a review of the tapes. And afterwards you're screwed. The pattern would stand out like a red flag. Collusion is physical cheating, and real cheating sends you to jail. And the number of hand necessary to make this a profitable play increases the prospect of being caught. All that for an extra bet or two per hour? Not worth it.
Related Questions:
How much money own you lost playing slots?
Last night i won $200 playing slots, so today I went back and lost it adjectives and now i feel like s**t. How much money enjoy you lost in one night on slots? I know that my dad used $300 in slots and got around half of it afterwards, I loled My wife and I...
Best Online Casino?Where To Play ?
Lookin for chgo suntimes scratch2 win numbers for may 1, 3, 4 plus sunday bonus gratitude?
What are the duties of a blackjack dealer in a casino?
If I was playing million-dollar poker on national TV and I lost all my money and...?
on pokerstars?
What does it mean when someone boots me from a table?
More questions-part 8?
What should blinds be set at for a change team game?
- THE HYPOTHETICAL CHEAT (involves dealer collusion): When the contractor peeks for blackjack he signals with a code if he is PAT or STIFF. When player has a 16 vs 10 he hits when the pusher is PAT, and stands when the player is STIFF. It is important that the player does not use the collusion signal on any other hand or it will eventually attract the attention of casino shelter.
- This "small" cheat will give the player the same loving of statistical advantage that can be achieved by card counting and would be impossible to detect by protection. Also, unlike card counting, you can continue to flat bet.
- Most dealer collusion cheats are caught because the player make unbelievably accurate "guesses". Or if a dealer is paid to accord a "card slug" he is caught because the player suddenly place huge winning bets. A camera review shows the same cards as the previous paw. The advantage of this cheat is that it only provides a subtle increase surrounded by probability (you have to trust me on mathematics).
- What do you think? Would you do it?
Answers:
You are going to go broke so fast the dealer are going to have to deal contained by slow motion or they will miss you. There is no 'difficult call' about a 16 against a dealer 7 or above. 16 is a losing foot full stop. You might as well hit it. It is for that reason you split your 8's. Most casinos don't do that 'Peek' bullshit stuff anymore anyway.
Blackjack is a STAKING activity. You just play your standard game and press your bets when you are playing next to the house money or feel lucky.
You are of course assuming that in attendance are still casinos where the dealer in fact peaks at the card. Most, if not adjectives, have gone to electronic readers eliminate the dealer. Your last comment around most casinos in America still using the peek is misinformed. Tell me where on earth they still peek and I will book a flight.
If you want to win at BJ you should be sitting at a table that allows a surrendure of 15/16 against that dealer 10. Yes, hypothetical statistics would indicate if at hand are 5 players at a table with 2-6 decks contained by play, and you are at 3rd base with 16 against a pusher 10, and the first 4 players drew 2+ cards to make their hands that you are hitting a 10. So what! Without collusion, you can come to a similar conclusion more or less the dealer's card. The reality is, depending on the shuffle and number of decks you could hold 40 low cards all play in a round followed by 12 glorious cards played in the following.
Unless you have a huge bankroll, and can play beneath the raydar with incredible counting skills that can outplay the current decks and rules person implored by most casinos, your best bet is to lay basic strategy at the best rules to the likelihood tables and stop trying to out-think the game .. . it will see your butt.
If it took any more than 10 minutes to spot you following a peddler around his/her allotted tables I would want to know why. If my security department didn't know you know the dealer, I would also want to know why. If your dealer could verbs off a signal that allowed you to pick up on 16 against a 10 consistently there would be a big reshuffle within my CCTV department.
Been abandoned in europe? I have a sneaking suspicion that you will find that it was never used out side the US.
I would not have anything to do beside this. The reward is simply not worth the risk. Card counting depends on being able to rise and fall the size of your bet. This isn't possible in your system, all you're doing is prizewinning a hand (sometimes) you would have otherwise lost. And single in a very specific situation. Let's say aloud all your numbers and methods are accurate. How often would this situation come up, and how commonly would the information actually change the outcome? Once, I don`t know twice an hour? That's below the signal to noise ratio of the expected variance. In order to capitalize on that slight creep you would need to play a LOT of hands. And adjectives it takes is one pit boss to notice that you've "gotten lucky" near 16 a few times to call for a review of the tapes. And afterwards you're screwed. The pattern would stand out like a red flag. Collusion is physical cheating, and real cheating sends you to jail. And the number of hand necessary to make this a profitable play increases the prospect of being caught. All that for an extra bet or two per hour? Not worth it.
Related Questions:
How much money own you lost playing slots?
Last night i won $200 playing slots, so today I went back and lost it adjectives and now i feel like s**t. How much money enjoy you lost in one night on slots? I know that my dad used $300 in slots and got around half of it afterwards, I loled My wife and I...
The answers post by the user, for information only, GamblingAsk.com does not guarantee the right.